COVID-19 > Discharge Criteria

Topic Area

State the broad topic question and focus of the review

Methods

This will likely be ‘materials submitted voluntarily by our group’ but can also (eventually) include surveys or focused research.

Summary of OVERALL report findings:

The goal of the report overall, number of sites involved, and any general site characteristics we can discern from the reviews. Rationale for clinical questions asked. Those with most and least information, areas of most/least concordance. Other major takeaways. Future needs or questions in development. Questions

3a-xx:
a. Summary of findings for Question A
b. Summary of findings for Question B
c. Etc

Gaps and Future Directions

Can describe key cross-cutting gaps. Outline needs for data. If/when we have research projects we can list them here.

Useful Resources

Public links and references as gathered by the group and thought to be of use in interpreting the report, provided support for its preparation, or of general use.

If you wish to participate and/or have further access into the knowledge base, please register here or contact us directly at:

Andrew.Auerbach@ucsf.edu
or
Tiffany.Lee@ucsf.edu

LOGIN TO KNOWLEDGE BASE

HOMERuN COVID-19 Practice Synthesis

Discharge Criteria Overview:

An important question facing hospitals across the US is determining when it is safe to discharge patients; unlike other infectious conditions, COVID-19 often gets worse in the second week of illness after a period of initial stability.  Discharging patients too soon can increase the risk that patients will get sicker after leaving the hospital, potentially leading to delays in care and worse outcomes.  But keeping patients in the hospital until they have fully recovered would overwhelming our health care system. It is thus critical to understand who can be discharged safely, minimizing length of stay and bed occupancy while also minimizing post-discharge adverse outcomes such as readmission. In the absence of evidence of help guide these decisions, HOMERuN has conducted a rapid review of discharge criteria at member hospitals by comparing and contrasting discharge practices at 22 academic medical centers.

Team Leads – Names with contact information
Authors – Names with contact information

LOGIN TO KNOWLEDGE BASE

Overview Statement

Team Leads – Names with contact information
Authors – Names with contact information

Overview Statement

Team Leads – Names with contact information
Authors – Names with contact information

Overview Statement

Team Leads – Names with contact information
Authors – Names with contact information

Overview Statement

Team Leads – Names with contact information
Authors – Names with contact information